
so when a christian, a hebrew or a muslim makes a scientific discovery it's because of their religion and therefore of great importance, but when someone like euclid comes up with something of real significance it's irrelevant.
smacks of apologist sentiment to me.
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 18:47,
archived)
smacks of apologist sentiment to me.

that "the Greeks were making good headway in discrediting religion and mysticism". Quite a lot of the Greek philosophers were very mystical, in fact. Of course Galileo et al didn't discredit Aristotelian physics because he was a Christian, but you speak as if religious people never said anything clever at all, as if religion were opposed in principle to science, or even to thinking, and that the bounties of modernity are all ultimately creditable to the Greeks.
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 18:58,
archived)

especially with an administration like the catholic church as the dominant authority
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 19:05,
archived)

Religious people have said clever things throughout the ages and not because they were any less religious than their contemporaries. Being clever and being religious are entirely orthogonal properties. And you haven't read up on the Conflict Thesis yet, have you?
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 19:09,
archived)

is in no way a hindrance?
I did the conflict thesis at university yes, shall I list a load of literature and you can tell me if you've read up on it?
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 19:28,
archived)
I did the conflict thesis at university yes, shall I list a load of literature and you can tell me if you've read up on it?