
im trying to finish it on hard now, and its a reloading (as in dying, then reloading) simulator for me! Never really been that keen on the campaigns for these sort of games, as you die every 10 seconds, as all the enemies are aiming for you from 10 miles away, despite being in a squad of many other troops.
Its the online that draws me in with battlefield. Unlike MW's fairly cramped, lazer quest style maps and rampant doom style deathmatches, battlefield is more open, more free and team based. Its kind of like a less realistic version of that ARMA game i keep being impressed by.
Lots of sniping when prone in the bushes and creeping up behind people and stabbing them. Laying C4 and Claymore traps is so much fun too :-D
( ,
Mon 14 Nov 2011, 12:21,
archived)
Its the online that draws me in with battlefield. Unlike MW's fairly cramped, lazer quest style maps and rampant doom style deathmatches, battlefield is more open, more free and team based. Its kind of like a less realistic version of that ARMA game i keep being impressed by.
Lots of sniping when prone in the bushes and creeping up behind people and stabbing them. Laying C4 and Claymore traps is so much fun too :-D

Not dying all the time, but the fact it's more realistic than MW3, in that you have jobs to do, you have objectives to complete, whereas MW3 is about getting the most kills (in Team Deathmatch anyway)
( ,
Mon 14 Nov 2011, 12:25,
archived)

The game is very realistic, especially on Hard. The underground mission in the Villa
nearly made my heart stop. Tried it yesterday, sober, and did it!!! :)
Only dabbled in Multiplayer, but you're bang on about it being more tactical
and less run and dash like COD.
I would LOVE Rockstar to do a 'Sandbox' WW2 game! :)
( ,
Mon 14 Nov 2011, 12:27,
archived)
nearly made my heart stop. Tried it yesterday, sober, and did it!!! :)
Only dabbled in Multiplayer, but you're bang on about it being more tactical
and less run and dash like COD.
I would LOVE Rockstar to do a 'Sandbox' WW2 game! :)