
Burning the yule log etc. just seems so much closer to nature.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:01,
archived)


( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:23,
archived)

Yule is a pagan festival. Just because wicca stole it doesn't make it theirs.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:08,
archived)

Wicca is an actual religion, Pagan isn't - it's just something that's Heathen and Non-Christian.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:18,
archived)

The fact wicca is a (laughably) real religion doesn't mean they own the festival they stole from 1600 years before wicca was created.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:27,
archived)

but they do burn the yule log so it's a tradition within their religion although in truth it would appear they are Neo-paganistic rather than some ancient religious that the Christians assimilated as their own. Nobody know enough about traditional pagan religions as mostly they didn't write stuff down but it's clear that Christian used most of pagan belief system to ease the transition from pagan to christian. But Pagan is certainly a generic term so it wrong to attribute anything to them as it's more likely to be bits of one religion and bits of another. Nonethe less I prefer the agrarian based religions as they re based upon nature and seasons rather than some abstract concepts of Heaven and Earth.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:35,
archived)

it's closer to the mark to say they couldn't do anything about it so they let them carry on.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:41,
archived)

December the 21st is the Winter solstice and has been pre-dating Christianity if is understood that in some quarters that Christians used this date as the birth of Christ when evidence shows Jesus was probably born nearer to March/April time according to the star alignment and the change to the Gregorian calendar. But I'm not going to argue points I don't actually believe in it takes too many presumption on both sides to form an accurate conclusion.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:47,
archived)

it's an astronomical thing. As mentioned below, however, the date of Christianity is more likely from the Roman festival of the Sol Invictus.
There is, as far as I know, no evidence at all for the date of the birth of Jesus. Christmas wasn't celebrated at all until about the 3rd century because Jews didn't celebrate birthdays. Any attempt to relate the Star of Bethlehem to a real astronomical event is not only highly speculative but highly missing the point.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:52,
archived)
There is, as far as I know, no evidence at all for the date of the birth of Jesus. Christmas wasn't celebrated at all until about the 3rd century because Jews didn't celebrate birthdays. Any attempt to relate the Star of Bethlehem to a real astronomical event is not only highly speculative but highly missing the point.

there are questions regarding all religions.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:57,
archived)

Or ascribing a tradtion to belongs to a religion that is younger than it by over 1 and a half millenia?
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:42,
archived)

but it's not a traditional one, as much as it likes to present itself as such.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:29,
archived)

( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:37,
archived)

trying to re-establish the old agrarian religions. Which is mostly guess work as most pagan religions were not documented.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:41,
archived)

If there were any real effort to properly reconstruct the ancient belief systems, from what little we do know of them, there would be arrests.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:48,
archived)

so it really is impossible to come to any conclusions about paganism in terms of the ancient agrarian-religions that existed in this country. The best model of paganism is the Native North Americans which shows close ties with nature and close community spirit, but whether British pagans followed these ideals is open for speculation.
( ,
Fri 2 Dec 2011, 19:55,
archived)