I liked it, it's just big giffs start to freeze and fuck my PC, and they're getting posted more frequently..
Someone posted a 3.5Mb one yesterday, that requiered task manager to escape and restart to get things going again...
( ,
Tue 31 Jan 2012, 18:43,
archived)
Looks perfectly ok and I agree about the huge gifs being posted lately
Frame rate really could be faster though as potential punter isn't going to stand there waiting for each line
( ,
Tue 31 Jan 2012, 18:53,
archived)
indeed
though it's literally a function of the number of screens we have multiplexed to create the size of screen we have. With a smarter controller we could get a higher frame rate but that's a) what version 2's are for and b) a creative constraint!
( ,
Tue 31 Jan 2012, 19:04,
archived)
damn those creative restraints
go down the pub drink 10 pints go back and insist they do it your way (used to work for me) :D
( ,
Tue 31 Jan 2012, 19:22,
archived)
Frame rate is always a sod to get right with people using so many different browsers...
What flys in one browser, lags in another one....
( ,
Tue 31 Jan 2012, 19:07,
archived)
I made this when all I used was IE6.. it was timed perfectly as I thought
Now I use Firefox, the first time I reposted it an saw it in Firwfox, JEEEEEZZZE!
I keep meaning to retime it so it's least fit inducing, don't click if you don't like flashy.....although if you use IE you should be fine..
www.b3tards.com/u/380e5b53a37701afdd20/zapparecurdouble2.gif
( ,
Tue 31 Jan 2012, 19:20,
archived)
I keep meaning to retime it so it's least fit inducing, don't click if you don't like flashy.....although if you use IE you should be fine..
www.b3tards.com/u/380e5b53a37701afdd20/zapparecurdouble2.gif
I had same problem, can't remember the technical reason why
but I remember a nice person here said Firefox was fairly accurate for speed
( ,
Tue 31 Jan 2012, 19:36,
archived)