
I have shown you where you say it's 'because', it's the clause 'I just so don't understand'. You haven't put up any sort of coherent argument against this. Just saying I haven't explained it DOESN'T MAKE IT TRUE. I've explained it. Twice. I've answered the questions you say I'm ignoring. Twice. Shall I say it again? THE QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED. TWICE.
( ,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:36,
archived)

Like I said I'll let you have the last word :-)
( ,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:41,
archived)

It's not my fault you said something which proves you're a dick. It's not my fault you don't understand how clearly you've shown it.
Again you're attacking my character with nothing to back yourself up with.
( ,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:43,
archived)
Again you're attacking my character with nothing to back yourself up with.

The "it" in the message you were replying to was "you're a dick", this statement refering to you, that is the invisable man.
This makes the sentence read as "Some has shown that [the invisable man] is a dick..." which, I'm sure, was not your intention.
You meant a more open "Someone has shown that they're a dick...".
Which would have implied that I [Mu], was being a dick.
You're really not very good at this English thing, are you? I'm having to fix your insults for you.
( ,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:04,
archived)
This makes the sentence read as "Some has shown that [the invisable man] is a dick..." which, I'm sure, was not your intention.
You meant a more open "Someone has shown that they're a dick...".
Which would have implied that I [Mu], was being a dick.
You're really not very good at this English thing, are you? I'm having to fix your insults for you.