no, I was saying I'd be more than happy to have my photo taken in exchange for lots of stuffI don't think I'm being jealous there, just trying to strike a deal which if you ask me weighs heavily in my favour
(
HappyToast Groat froth,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:02,
archived)
so... you think it's acceptable for this to happen because they are rich?even if they don't want it to?
(,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:04,
archived)
no, I'm saying that I will get my tits out in exchange for massive wealth HappyToast Groat froth,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:05,
archived)
you said "massive wealth"*sniggers*
(
brown-wings Made with three kinds of butter,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:08,
archived)
I did, is this a faux pas I was previously unaware of? HappyToast Groat froth,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:10,
archived)
in response to the question you are asking about is it right or wrong to take someone's photo without their permissionThey're massively high profile and it's sadly what paparazzi get paid for so they should be expecting it to a degree. Doesn't make it right though.
I just think its depressing that what someone's tits look like is front page news
(I just think its depressing that what someone's tits look like is front page news
HappyToast Groat froth,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:16,
archived)
But... if they really wanted privacy in their marriageMaybe shutting a country down for a day in order to televise their wedding wasn't the best way to go about it.
(
Butters and his titanium codsocket,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:23,
archived)