![Challenge Entry: What Lies Beneath [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
From the What Lies Beneath challenge. See all 87 entries (closed)
( , Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:13, archived)

( , Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:28, archived)

They're rubbish. The photos and her tits.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:33,
archived)


and you can take all the photos from half a mile away of me you like
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:42,
archived)

they have things and you don't?
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:43,
archived)

I don't think I'm being jealous there, just trying to strike a deal which if you ask me weighs heavily in my favour
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:02,
archived)

even if they don't want it to?
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:04,
archived)


They're massively high profile and it's sadly what paparazzi get paid for so they should be expecting it to a degree. Doesn't make it right though.
I just think its depressing that what someone's tits look like is front page news
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:16,
archived)
I just think its depressing that what someone's tits look like is front page news

Maybe shutting a country down for a day in order to televise their wedding wasn't the best way to go about it.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:23,
archived)

lets say it's your other half we're talking about... even if you had loads of money etc, you'd be happy for someone to be taking pictures of her norks?
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:47,
archived)

If I and my other half happen to be world famous and constantly followed by Pap-scumbags who get paid by shite rags and my other half said; "Q darling, I think I'll remove ones breast garment, by the outdoor pool, as it's SO hot and this brassier is SO restrictive". I'd probably reply, "OK missy, but you do know that those 50 Pap-shitheads stationed on those 5 boats over there, are probably focusing their Long distance lenses on you, for such a moment?"
To tell you the truth, I believe the Royal family have got themselves a great new PR team and they are doing a great job at keeping the Royal family hip, young and current and constantly in the world's media?
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:48,
archived)
To tell you the truth, I believe the Royal family have got themselves a great new PR team and they are doing a great job at keeping the Royal family hip, young and current and constantly in the world's media?

And it appears to be working on some. *Pointing no elbows above*
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 13:01,
archived)

but I must just be weird
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:58,
archived)

If only someone on the internet was savvy enough to exploit this concept
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:10,
archived)

lolshockz
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:16,
archived)

If it was just a previous Big Brother contestant who'd been photographed topless, would anyone, except the morons who read Closer anyway, give a toss?
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:25,
archived)


are claiming benefits, enjoy Eastenders and have the mental intelligence of a fig.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:28,
archived)

in the fact that there's a market for photos of famous people doing really mundane things.
The right hand column of the daily mail website for a start
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:34,
archived)
The right hand column of the daily mail website for a start

( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:37,
archived)

They'd have nothing to distract them from how sad and cunty their lives are, which will only make them sadder and cuntier.
They're already sad and cunty enough as it is. Don't make things worse!
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:43,
archived)
They're already sad and cunty enough as it is. Don't make things worse!

I'm off to listen to Tool.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:46,
archived)

( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:34,
archived)

I just think it shouldn't be dismissed on the grounds that the photos aren't very good.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:36,
archived)


it's a bit duplicitous of the papers to get all steamed about this. If they were being consistent they'd be going on about how good/bad they are, not the fact a picture has been taken of them.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:43,
archived)

tomorrows Sun front page
EXCLUSIVE, KATE'S TITS, OUR OFFICIAL JUDGEMENT
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:52,
archived)
EXCLUSIVE, KATE'S TITS, OUR OFFICIAL JUDGEMENT

out of Kate's tits. As taxpayers we have a right to see them.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 12:01,
archived)

Given how famous they are however, getting your chebs out for an airing is probably unwise as there is always the possibility somebody will be out there trying to get a photo.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:27,
archived)

are there any controversial bills being passed today?..hmmm

"We need to pass this dodgy bill tomorrow, so what story can we hide it behind?"
"We've got those tit pics sir, that'll keep the sheep of our back?"
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 13:44,
archived)
"We've got those tit pics sir, that'll keep the sheep of our back?"

They do look a bit like my first girlfriend's tits, which has got me a bit nostalgic.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:43,
archived)

i can't even knock one out to these.
i thought the days of 'grainy, long distance telephoto lens with a shitty 2X converter added on' were over.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:49,
archived)
i thought the days of 'grainy, long distance telephoto lens with a shitty 2X converter added on' were over.

We could all be like the Himba and not give a fuck whether boobicles were out or not.
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 12:11,
archived)

( , Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:50, archived)

I'm not sure I can be arsed cloning out all the background though
( ,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:56,
archived)