b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » What Lies Beneath » Message 10847666

[challenge entry]

From the What Lies Beneath challenge. See all 87 entries (closed)

(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:13, archived)
# they're shit photos anyway, don't know what the fuss is about.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:28, archived)
# Is that what all this fuss is about?
They're rubbish. The photos and her tits.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:33, archived)
# ^ haha indeed
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:51, archived)
# ^^^THIS !!!^^^
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 14:16, archived)
# Can't look. Busy making queen mother necrophilia pics.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:34, archived)
# yay
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:52, archived)
# yeah... I'd be happy for people to invade my privacy if the resultant pictures weren't very good
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:38, archived)
# give me a few castles, all of Cambridgeshire and a life of constant holidays
and you can take all the photos from half a mile away of me you like
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:42, archived)
# so, this boils down to jealousy?
they have things and you don't?
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:43, archived)
# no, I was saying I'd be more than happy to have my photo taken in exchange for lots of stuff
I don't think I'm being jealous there, just trying to strike a deal which if you ask me weighs heavily in my favour
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:02, archived)
# so... you think it's acceptable for this to happen because they are rich?
even if they don't want it to?
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:04, archived)
# no, I'm saying that I will get my tits out in exchange for massive wealth
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:05, archived)
# you said "massive wealth"
*sniggers*
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:08, archived)
# I did, is this a faux pas I was previously unaware of?
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:10, archived)
# righto
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:10, archived)
# in response to the question you are asking about is it right or wrong to take someone's photo without their permission
They're massively high profile and it's sadly what paparazzi get paid for so they should be expecting it to a degree. Doesn't make it right though.

I just think its depressing that what someone's tits look like is front page news
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:16, archived)
# But... if they really wanted privacy in their marriage
Maybe shutting a country down for a day in order to televise their wedding wasn't the best way to go about it.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:23, archived)
# yeah... their own fault really
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:26, archived)
# ^ this
They can have close-ups if they want
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:45, archived)
# ok then... different tack
lets say it's your other half we're talking about... even if you had loads of money etc, you'd be happy for someone to be taking pictures of her norks?
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:47, archived)
# Ok then
If I and my other half happen to be world famous and constantly followed by Pap-scumbags who get paid by shite rags and my other half said; "Q darling, I think I'll remove ones breast garment, by the outdoor pool, as it's SO hot and this brassier is SO restrictive". I'd probably reply, "OK missy, but you do know that those 50 Pap-shitheads stationed on those 5 boats over there, are probably focusing their Long distance lenses on you, for such a moment?"
To tell you the truth, I believe the Royal family have got themselves a great new PR team and they are doing a great job at keeping the Royal family hip, young and current and constantly in the world's media?
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:48, archived)
# ^this^
with added "make the masses feel sorry for them"
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:51, archived)
# hahaha
And it appears to be working on some. *Pointing no elbows above*
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 13:01, archived)
# they look like camera phone photos
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:55, archived)
# to me, it's not the quality of the photos that are the issue, but the fact someone was trying to take the photos in the first place...
but I must just be weird
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:58, archived)
# It's almost as if humans are curious about what other humans look like naked
If only someone on the internet was savvy enough to exploit this concept
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:10, archived)
# You could be on to something there.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 13:44, archived)
# I'm a little surprised that you're surprised that someone has taken pictures of a celebrity with their bewbs out?
lolshockz
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:16, archived)
# This
If it was just a previous Big Brother contestant who'd been photographed topless, would anyone, except the morons who read Closer anyway, give a toss?
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:25, archived)
# if we're talking about a Big Brother contestant, then knocking bet is that they'll have arranged the photos anyway
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:28, archived)
# Let's face it. The kind of people who are interested in this kind of thing
are claiming benefits, enjoy Eastenders and have the mental intelligence of a fig.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:28, archived)
# this is a large portion of what bothers me...
in the fact that there's a market for photos of famous people doing really mundane things.

The right hand column of the daily mail website for a start
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:34, archived)
# It's the society we live in sadly. Cunty people want other cunty people to snap familiar looking cunty people to feed their inordinately sad cunty lives.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:37, archived)
# And if people weren't able to live vicariously through people they've seen on the TV
They'd have nothing to distract them from how sad and cunty their lives are, which will only make them sadder and cuntier.

They're already sad and cunty enough as it is. Don't make things worse!
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:43, archived)
# Ooo. You mentioned the word Vicarious...
I'm off to listen to Tool.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:46, archived)
# Word.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 14:25, archived)
# who said I was surprised?
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:27, archived)
# Ok, maybe not surprise but the fact that you are annoyed that a pap has photographed a naked 'sleb.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:34, archived)
# I'm not annoyed at the photo (although as I say above, the fact there's a market for this shite bothers me)
I just think it shouldn't be dismissed on the grounds that the photos aren't very good.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:36, archived)
# equally, it shouldn't be dismissed on the grounds that they have a fuckton of money
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:37, archived)
# Given all the attention that was paid to her sisters arse when Will and Kate got married,
it's a bit duplicitous of the papers to get all steamed about this. If they were being consistent they'd be going on about how good/bad they are, not the fact a picture has been taken of them.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:43, archived)
# hahahaha
tomorrows Sun front page
EXCLUSIVE, KATE'S TITS, OUR OFFICIAL JUDGEMENT
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:52, archived)
# The Mirror would be asking if we were getting value for money
out of Kate's tits. As taxpayers we have a right to see them.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 12:01, archived)
# ^
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 12:35, archived)
# who fucking cares they're a bunch of leaching cunts
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:19, archived)
# I understand your point.
Given how famous they are however, getting your chebs out for an airing is probably unwise as there is always the possibility somebody will be out there trying to get a photo.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:27, archived)
# yea..it all smacks of pr.

are there any controversial bills being passed today?..hmmm
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:37, archived)
# Totally
"We need to pass this dodgy bill tomorrow, so what story can we hide it behind?"
"We've got those tit pics sir, that'll keep the sheep of our back?"
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 13:44, archived)
# Hm
They do look a bit like my first girlfriend's tits, which has got me a bit nostalgic.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:43, archived)
# but you were in your mid forties at the time
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:44, archived)
# I wish I was
It'd mean I'm ageing backwards
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:45, archived)
# haha - nostalgia tits
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:50, archived)
# bless
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:53, archived)
# god, they are rubbish
i can't even knock one out to these.

i thought the days of 'grainy, long distance telephoto lens with a shitty 2X converter added on' were over.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:49, archived)
# If only tits were like hands and weren't rude, then no one would be bothered.
We could all be like the Himba and not give a fuck whether boobicles were out or not.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 12:11, archived)
# Ha ha, thought b3ta would be full of this sort of thing already.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:50, archived)
# I was 'shopping her severed at the waist
I'm not sure I can be arsed cloning out all the background though
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:56, archived)
# It's hard to care about these things.
On the plus side, I now have a quality control advice label I can shop onto other peoples images.
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 10:59, archived)
# \o/
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:09, archived)
#
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:12, archived)
# :D
(, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 12:16, archived)