If you can't afford food for the second child, feed it the first one.
drimble he'd been white, he'd been black,
Wed 9 Jan 2013, 11:12,
archived)
Or sell it.
Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Wed 9 Jan 2013, 11:23,
archived)
Yes,because people's circumstances *never* change after they've had children. No one's ever lost a job or got ill or anything.
Note: I'm not particularly against cutting benefit for high earners, though not sure if this one's been done right. Afaict, a household with two people earning 49k don't lose anything, but a single parent earning 50k does?
(Note: I'm not particularly against cutting benefit for high earners, though not sure if this one's been done right. Afaict, a household with two people earning 49k don't lose anything, but a single parent earning 50k does?
FridgeBadger,
Wed 9 Jan 2013, 12:18,
archived)
Oh sure - if a parent loses a job then help them - like JSA, but it shouldn't be mandatory.Particularly if the household has a £50k+ earner in it.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Wed 9 Jan 2013, 12:31,
archived)