
'Expert witnesses described the kit as 'completely ineffectual' and an 'affront' to science.'
McCormick: 'Good point!'
( ,
Tue 23 Apr 2013, 17:43,
archived)
McCormick: 'Good point!'

as a pile of crap too.
Made a bit of cash, didn't he? People have known about this scam for years; they just haven't bothered to prosecute him as they know he's not defrauding citizens of this country. Be interesting to see if a British court can make a case stick. And if they can, why they didn't stop him earlier? As is often mentioned, he got around export controls by demonstrating that the devices didn't actually do anything.
( ,
Tue 23 Apr 2013, 17:57,
archived)
Made a bit of cash, didn't he? People have known about this scam for years; they just haven't bothered to prosecute him as they know he's not defrauding citizens of this country. Be interesting to see if a British court can make a case stick. And if they can, why they didn't stop him earlier? As is often mentioned, he got around export controls by demonstrating that the devices didn't actually do anything.

by referring to them as 'novelty' items... a bit like those condom machines in pub toilets that say you shouldn't use them as a contraceptive, they're just 'fun'.
Agreed, the entire case seems to be a bit of a paradox. Made for £15, sold for £10,000... I'd like to see him on Dragon's Den :)
( ,
Tue 23 Apr 2013, 18:18,
archived)
Agreed, the entire case seems to be a bit of a paradox. Made for £15, sold for £10,000... I'd like to see him on Dragon's Den :)