This is morally questionable.
(Come to think of it, this is bloody WRONG, and you probably ruined a few people's days here.)
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:30,
archived)
morally questionable fun
is the funniest fun you can have fun with
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:32,
archived)
aaww come on!
it was so hot that day, getting a soaking would have been like a gift!
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:34,
archived)
i agree
but if a copper had been watching i dont think he'd have seen it that way. carry on by all means, just keep a look out is all
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:36,
archived)
It bloody wouldn't.
I refer you to Batsgirl's comment below. It's not big, and it's not clever, it's just pissing people off and ruining their day (or possibly worse if you hit the wrong person).
The key to good humour is that nobody gets hurt. The "money grabbers" video that sailed through here a few weeks ago was great because of that. But this is just wrong.
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:37,
archived)
The key to good humour is that nobody gets hurt. The "money grabbers" video that sailed through here a few weeks ago was great because of that. But this is just wrong.
In fact, on reflection,
I'd like to declare him an utter bastard and say that should I ever meet him, I'll shove his super soaker up his arse*.
* not necessarily true
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:34,
archived)
* not necessarily true
someone did that to me once
Not only did I have a panic attack (seriously), I also ended up walking down a busy street in a clinging wet white top.
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:34,
archived)
Heh. I notice that he's forgotten
to blank out the numberplate on the car that they're firing from. That could be a mistake.
(I could make a crass comment about the top, but I won't.)
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:39,
archived)
(I could make a crass comment about the top, but I won't.)
Let's put it this way
a see-through top is not conducive to calming down.
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:41,
archived)
Yeah.
Trouble is, the bastard with the water pistol wouldn't care.
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:46,
archived)
Not that I'd have a problem
with a see-through top in other circumstances ;-)
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:50,
archived)
Oh, all right then.
I wouldn't have a problem with your see-through top either.
/coat
( ,
Sun 25 May 2003, 21:58,
archived)
/coat