I demand a greater level of specification!
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:19,
archived)
I had a brick and dog poo roll. It was lovely. I followed it with a crusty roll in a crusty roll. Then a rat roll.
Marmite is just the exception that proves the rule.
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:20,
archived)
Marmite is just the exception that proves the rule.
How can an exception prove a rule? Surely the mere existance of an exception causes the whole rule stucture to collapse?
bonkers.
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:25,
archived)
bonkers.
an exception proving a rule. An exception TO a rule, now that's a different matter...
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:26,
archived)
as a linear vector marker in a subcutaneous amalgum spore, instead of an oscillating carrot.
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:26,
archived)
I'm always worrying over subcutaneous vector markers instead of wobbly carrots.
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:28,
archived)
means something like 'test'.
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:28,
archived)
Oh the joys of the english language.
I'm just of to prove my dough before baking...
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:30,
archived)
I'm just of to prove my dough before baking...
www.quinion.com/words/qa/qa-exc1.htm
I just looked it up.
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:30,
archived)
I just looked it up.
From now on I shall use "the exception confirms the rule in the cases not excepted" instead.
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:36,
archived)
To test something.
IE - (Orignally) The exception that proves the rule = the exception that tests the rule.
But the meaning of that saying has followed the change in the meaning of "to prove" - which makes no sense really, but we still use it.
/Bryson
(,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:30,
archived)
IE - (Orignally) The exception that proves the rule = the exception that tests the rule.
But the meaning of that saying has followed the change in the meaning of "to prove" - which makes no sense really, but we still use it.
/Bryson