it works for me.
:)
and i'm used to the nonsensical nonsense that it has.
and i'm not running redhat.
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:34,
archived)
and i'm used to the nonsensical nonsense that it has.
and i'm not running redhat.
dont need to.
i can use wine for some of the video nonsense.
but some lovevly people reimplemented quicktime. and it's faster.
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:36,
archived)
but some lovevly people reimplemented quicktime. and it's faster.
no, mplayer now supports quicktime (has done for a couple of months though)
it's a right bastard to get working though at times.
www.mplayerhq.hu/
not for the faint of heart.
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:37,
archived)
www.mplayerhq.hu/
not for the faint of heart.
it looks far too scary.
why can't they just give me a nice rpm that'll work for suse?
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:39,
archived)
xine rpms.
cambuca.ldhs.cetuc.puc-rio.br/xine/
mplayer is compiled so it doesnt slow down. at all.
also. i've got about 140+ codecs installed.
and quicktime, and mediaplayer 9.
:D
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:42,
archived)
mplayer is compiled so it doesnt slow down. at all.
also. i've got about 140+ codecs installed.
and quicktime, and mediaplayer 9.
:D
what player are you using right now
xine might be a nicer choice than mplayer.
xine.sourceforge.net/
:)
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:40,
archived)
xine.sourceforge.net/
:)
well, i think i've got them both installed,
it's just a matter of me not having tried anything other than double clicking on the files in kde.
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:43,
archived)
after a few goes and realising it's 100% of EVIL, i gave suse8.2 a go.
it's actually fairly nice and tolerable, but just not usuable for most things.
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:35,
archived)
oh ans secondly.
i have a p3 450. it's a bit fucked if i want to do more than one thing with windows. with linux i've burned cds and watched films. at the same time.
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:36,
archived)
linux won't play any video files in avi format,
i can hear but not see. the only ones i can see are mpegs, it seems. and despite only having 112megs of ram (which is less than the minimum spec for xp, i'm pretty sure), windows copes a lot better with doing lots of things at once than linux so far.
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:38,
archived)
mines a bit horrifically customized.
barely anything running, new shiny kernel, premtive patches, etc etc :)
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:39,
archived)
have you tried xine?
It copes with most things I've tried it with so far (dvd, divx, avi, wmv, other stuff). Probably the best linux media player I've seen.
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:43,
archived)
it's ok.
i prefer mplayer.
it isn't as friendly but it's a lot more powerful.
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:46,
archived)
it isn't as friendly but it's a lot more powerful.
I'll have a look.
I need to sort out my media players - something has broken xine's dvd playback. I wussed out and got someone else to install it, so I'm a bit stuffed!
( ,
Sat 2 Aug 2003, 23:51,
archived)
mplayer! big w/y/h!
mplayer is the finest piece of software.
mate o' mine, when he can't get a video to run on windoze, he boots up linux and mplayer just yums it up!
me, i haven't had windoze installed here for 3 years and there's little i can't do with linux. what the hell is it you people need to do? get viruses? install spyware?
( ,
Sun 3 Aug 2003, 0:04,
archived)
mate o' mine, when he can't get a video to run on windoze, he boots up linux and mplayer just yums it up!
me, i haven't had windoze installed here for 3 years and there's little i can't do with linux. what the hell is it you people need to do? get viruses? install spyware?