ack come on!you can`t say things like that!
.... it`s because he`s ginger!
;-)
(.... it`s because he`s ginger!
;-)
Reckless_Rik,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:19,
archived)
i have nothing against gingersjust the bbc, thy're biased twunts who often "misinterpret" the facts, or change them to suit "auntie's" needs.
(
lo, the OTHER greebo warrior,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:20,
archived)
like you know what the fuck you're talking about. which facts have i got wrong so far?
(,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:30,
archived)
well you`ve gotta remember(and I`m not saying you`re wrong!) that it`s all solicitors and shit - only the people involved in the incident really know what happened
( Reckless_Rik,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:32,
archived)
he did not hide in his shed waiting for it to be broken intojust so he could shoot the theiving bastard.
if he had, the murder charge would have remained, as it would have been a pre-meditated attack, and therefore constituted murder, not manslaughter
(if he had, the murder charge would have remained, as it would have been a pre-meditated attack, and therefore constituted murder, not manslaughter
lo, the OTHER greebo warrior,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:33,
archived)