
all of you go and put a fucking KKK hood on martin luther and be done with it
ok?
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 20:06,
archived)
ok?

which I made earlier. To diffuse some of this tension over the challenge, why don't those who don't like it turn images off in their browsers, and only view the images which aren't challenge entries?
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 20:12,
archived)

as such.
but come on, be more original than putting a fucking hood onto any picture
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 20:13,
archived)
but come on, be more original than putting a fucking hood onto any picture

since there is so much spam for this comp
But there ya go.
didn't your mum ever tell you that "if you don't have anything nice to say don't say it at all"
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 20:12,
archived)
But there ya go.
didn't your mum ever tell you that "if you don't have anything nice to say don't say it at all"

is basically a bandwagon.
for which i've had my head taken off.
edit: i do not think the post is crap. i think it's great, as most bandwagons are. :)
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 20:10,
archived)
for which i've had my head taken off.
edit: i do not think the post is crap. i think it's great, as most bandwagons are. :)

There's a bandwagon within every challenge, except maybe last weeks, but there's been some very individual posts as well already.
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 20:14,
archived)

can be construed as a bandwagon, but some lend themselves more readily than others. this one and the smoking one leap to mind, from the recent challenges. it's easy to slap a hood or a cigarette in any image and call it a compo entry.
the "new uses for children" and "if cats ruled the world" competitions, conversely, have no visual meme (cigarette, hood, etc) that make it painfully simple to create a legitimate challenge entry.
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 20:18,
archived)
the "new uses for children" and "if cats ruled the world" competitions, conversely, have no visual meme (cigarette, hood, etc) that make it painfully simple to create a legitimate challenge entry.