
it means people like sarah lucas, daimian hirst and tracy emin who make a living by being talentless dickheads who sell piles of wank to charles saatchi. first against the wall.
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:40,
archived)

I've started you off again, haven't I?
Roll a fat one for godssake.
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:42,
archived)
Roll a fat one for godssake.

saatchi would be far more interested in buying their used tissues afterwards.
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:43,
archived)

after all if i could sell piles of household crap for hundereds of thousands of pounds i wouldnt be slogging my guts out as an engineer
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:42,
archived)

but at least you wouldnt be so fucking pretentious about it. I bet youd admit that it was just piles of household crap.
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:43,
archived)

and backed this up by selling it for ten pence, i might like them. but no.
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:45,
archived)

WHY DON'T PEOPLE MAKE PRETTY PICTURES ANY MORE?
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:44,
archived)

is FAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTT and brilliant. and not a picture.
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:48,
archived)

make actual art instead of conceptual bollocks that a monkey could do?
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:48,
archived)

think of the kittens.
And when did a monkey have a 'concept'?
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:52,
archived)
And when did a monkey have a 'concept'?

just that they make 'interesting' art and certainly spark discussion.
As we can see here.
( ,
Fri 22 Aug 2003, 23:51,
archived)
As we can see here.