
they say that scientists have been able to slow down and even stop a beam of light, and that they have found instances that the speed of the wave motion can be faster than c, like when travelling through a cesium atom, but the actual speed of light is still constant.
so i guess its possible for it to slow down, under certain conditions, but nearly impossible for it to effectively increase.
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 15:20,
archived)
so i guess its possible for it to slow down, under certain conditions, but nearly impossible for it to effectively increase.

Does that mean I might actualy manage to get my lightsaber?

for £2.50 and 17000 Proofs of purchase from your favorite Malted Badger® products
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 15:25,
archived)

but then you would just end up hitting someone with a stick of Gallium phosphide "which would still be cool"
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 15:26,
archived)

Light slows down when it's not in a vacuum, and you can sometimes gets particles passing through a material that are going faster than the speed of light in that material. They cause a cool shockwave burst of light called Cerenkov Radiation which is like the light version of a "sonic boom".
One wierd thing scientists have spotted is that light can seem to tunnel or jump from one side of a material to the other faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, which is supposed to be impossible.
Thats why they're trying to revise the rules to mean that information cannot be transmitted faster than light, cos thats when you start getting all sorts of fun causality loops and the like.
/physicist
/relurk
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 15:40,
archived)
One wierd thing scientists have spotted is that light can seem to tunnel or jump from one side of a material to the other faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, which is supposed to be impossible.
Thats why they're trying to revise the rules to mean that information cannot be transmitted faster than light, cos thats when you start getting all sorts of fun causality loops and the like.
/physicist
/relurk