
then you can just fry your cats brain with radiation waves
( ,
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 14:03,
archived)

I was never good at science, but I believe that radio waves are different from radiation. Still, fry your brains at enough frequency, but I don't think wireless is strong enough. Pleae correct me if I am wrong.
not really trying to be an ass, I really am curious if they are the same or not
( ,
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 14:06,
archived)
not really trying to be an ass, I really am curious if they are the same or not

are a long wavelength/low energy part of the EM spectrum aren't they?
( ,
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 14:07,
archived)

according to http://imagers.gsfc.nasa.gov/ems/radio.html yes
( ,
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 14:09,
archived)

but there's microwave radiation which is radio wave type stuff, and then nuclear radiation which is particles and stuff
( ,
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 14:09,
archived)

lan radiation isn't high enough frequency, i belive it's less powerful than mobile phone radiation
( ,
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 14:12,
archived)

that any of us can site suitably conclusive studies of the effect of LAN radiation on feline brains, so it's a moot point really.
( ,
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 14:13,
archived)

Nuclear radiation exhibits wave/particle duality anyway, I think. In short, they're all types of radiation.
( ,
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 14:12,
archived)

then particles and radiation are one in the same, if you consult Eipenhowers feline cranial radiation resistance tests (1957, published by national science magazine) youll cleary see that they are highly resistant to nuons and pi radio waves up to a strength of 13 rads per square inch....
( ,
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 14:16,
archived)

www.google.co.uk/search?q=Eipenhowers+feline+cranial+radiation+resistance+tests+&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
That and the fact I bothered to google it........
( ,
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 14:19,
archived)
That and the fact I bothered to google it........