
you state my point better than I could ever have done.
BTW I ended my previous messages love and dear to illustrate that I can patronise you as well as you think you can patronise me and as for your stereotype of a feminist it is flawed as I'm not a feminist as I think I stated about 3 times before. If you can't take your leg being pulled the fuck off, because it was you who started by generalising about the whole of female behaviour - so one good kick up the arse deserves another in my book
( ,
Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:26,
archived)
BTW I ended my previous messages love and dear to illustrate that I can patronise you as well as you think you can patronise me and as for your stereotype of a feminist it is flawed as I'm not a feminist as I think I stated about 3 times before. If you can't take your leg being pulled the fuck off, because it was you who started by generalising about the whole of female behaviour - so one good kick up the arse deserves another in my book

It's been years since I've tried arguing a point of rhetoric with a twelve-year-old. Excellent simulation. Well done.
(click)
( ,
Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:29,
archived)
(click)

12 year old? Great follow up - shit for brains
\edit shall I type (click) to pretend that I'm ignoring you.
( ,
Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:33,
archived)
\edit shall I type (click) to pretend that I'm ignoring you.

QED
edit: Yes, please do. Then I can fling childish insults at you when I think you can't see them and are therefore defenceless.
( ,
Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:35,
archived)
edit: Yes, please do. Then I can fling childish insults at you when I think you can't see them and are therefore defenceless.

get off your potty you're a "big boy" now.
( ,
Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:39,
archived)

Calling somebody 'pseudo-intellectual' without justification has the tiniest chance of being accepted by those who aren't paying attention. But first you have to spell it right.
( ,
Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:41,
archived)

and it was with full provocation caused by your anti-female attitude a right little can't-be-wrong aren't you.
( ,
Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:42,
archived)

When there's only you and I even paying attention, editing a post doesn't fool anyone. And where did you get 'anti-female' from? Have you actually paid any attention to anything said so far? No, I give up. This is ridiculous. It's like talking to a broken Infocom game.
( ,
Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:45,
archived)