
actually were in Lord of the Rings, but only in passing - when the party is walking through the forests outside Hobbiton they come across them.
One thing I think they probably should have done / should do is make a separate film of the Hobbit - it gives a much-needed description of how the One Ring came to be and how it was discovered. Also introduces Gollum and the ancestors of the ring bearers.
( ,
Thu 22 Jan 2004, 10:55,
archived)
One thing I think they probably should have done / should do is make a separate film of the Hobbit - it gives a much-needed description of how the One Ring came to be and how it was discovered. Also introduces Gollum and the ancestors of the ring bearers.

I think you might be right. Been a while since I read the Hobbit.
( ,
Thu 22 Jan 2004, 11:07,
archived)

Just after the centinal in the forrest, Lord Dumberdill (or something like that), and from what I gathered, the whole book is 3ed-person, but if bilbo isn't there, then it doesn't explain it.
They got around that in the films by showing parts without him.
I think the director is trying to get rights to another film, but the rummor is that it won't be The Hobit. This'll be done after he does King Kong.
( ,
Thu 22 Jan 2004, 11:08,
archived)
They got around that in the films by showing parts without him.
I think the director is trying to get rights to another film, but the rummor is that it won't be The Hobit. This'll be done after he does King Kong.