you are wrong
as it is a 2D representation of a 2D object floating in 3D space
(
mictoboy shitting in your cunt since,
Tue 17 Feb 2004, 18:51,
archived)
i think actually,
he reversed the polarity.
(
Tiggy Twitchin',
Tue 17 Feb 2004, 18:53,
archived)
don't cross the streams
it would be bad
(
mictoboy shitting in your cunt since,
Tue 17 Feb 2004, 18:54,
archived)
granted.
you never know where theyve been.
(
Tiggy Twitchin',
Tue 17 Feb 2004, 18:56,
archived)
Perhaps
he just modified the phase variance.
My word, that was obscure.
(
A Wooden Leg Named Smith,
Wed 18 Feb 2004, 17:30,
archived)
but it is RENDERED
which is typically what you do to output an image like that, so i suppose we are both correct in that sense.
(
rawr isn't really here.,
Tue 17 Feb 2004, 18:53,
archived)