
Make fun all you want, but Bush will win in 2004. MUAHAHAHAH and I will vote for him
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 7:26,
archived)

He will win again! Hahahahahahaha! And I will be able to eat all the kittens I want!
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 7:41,
archived)

And I'm a liberal/democrat!
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 7:50,
archived)

*contemplates deleting this post*
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 7:54,
archived)

he has brought the morale of this country to an all time high and has a lot of good ideas that he just needs to put into practice.
I wholly disagree with a lot of his policies (mainly abortion among others) but he is a good President and really, could Dean do any better?
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 7:58,
archived)
I wholly disagree with a lot of his policies (mainly abortion among others) but he is a good President and really, could Dean do any better?

i am sorry, but i dont care about morale. i care about policies. and they totally suck. its what he did that counts. not what he could have done coz he is such a nice compassionate man
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:07,
archived)

though there are a few I disagree with.
But I'm really glad it's Bush in the White House and not Gore.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:10,
archived)
But I'm really glad it's Bush in the White House and not Gore.

candidate??????
Like I said earlier, I'm very liberal/democratic....
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:15,
archived)
Like I said earlier, I'm very liberal/democratic....

think that the country's morale has improved... it depends on where you're at I guess. Pretty much everyone I speak to wants him out of office, and that we're all screwed if he wins again... perhaps it's all the rain.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:13,
archived)

and pretty much everyone I know hates Bush with a passion, but agrees he's been the best person in charge of this godforsaken country in the last 20 years.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:16,
archived)

how is this dichotomy possible?
what is it that makes him the "best"???
if at the same time they "hate" him???
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:20,
archived)
what is it that makes him the "best"???
if at the same time they "hate" him???

their staunch Democratic tendencies that have been ingrained in them since childhood, they're learning that politics isn't as straight forward as it seems.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:23,
archived)

that outside of the USA - in europe and practically everywhere else - the US has never been as much hated as now.
bush may create good morale inside the US, although i am still not quite convinced, but in the process he has pissed off the rest of the world by behaving like an emperor and by squashing more and more critical voices and bringing back a moral standard that is sooo prudish and conservative, it scares the living shit out of many people.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:27,
archived)
bush may create good morale inside the US, although i am still not quite convinced, but in the process he has pissed off the rest of the world by behaving like an emperor and by squashing more and more critical voices and bringing back a moral standard that is sooo prudish and conservative, it scares the living shit out of many people.

know about as much of US politics as you do European ones.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:31,
archived)

if a president of one nation takes it upon himself to start deciding whats good for the worlds fate and in the process ignores the UN and all other institutions that try to protect such things from happening, well he behaves like an emperor. we re back somewhere in germany in the 30's dude. the germans also thought hitler was the best thing that could happen to them...
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:43,
archived)

people always thought they could rule the world, and continue to do so. That will never change, dude.
I'm talking about my adopted country, not the world and like I said I disagree with a lot of Bush's policies but what I believe he's done for this country has been a good thing.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:46,
archived)
I'm talking about my adopted country, not the world and like I said I disagree with a lot of Bush's policies but what I believe he's done for this country has been a good thing.

the US Dollar has always been SOOOOOOOOOOOOO strong............
The economy was already in the shits - 100% FACT - and I don't see any of the other candidates proposing a feasible way to bring it back up!
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:14,
archived)
The economy was already in the shits - 100% FACT - and I don't see any of the other candidates proposing a feasible way to bring it back up!

Or, the US could almost be considered a modern Roman Empire... and what happened to that?
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:51,
archived)

and greatly improved the level of civilisation in Europe. We still use some of the Roman Empire's creations today -- like the alphabet.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:55,
archived)

by comparison with our society, but it was still a big improvement on the rulers it replaced. And it laid the foundations of modern Europe.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:02,
archived)

based on domination and conquership.
This country that I live in and that I love celebrates Thanksgiving every year, forgetting that they slaughtered the indigenous people shortly afterwards.
America is not even in the teething stage of world "domination" and for a country to be where it is after only 350 years is bloody amazing!
It took us Brits a hell of a lot longer than that!
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:06,
archived)
This country that I live in and that I love celebrates Thanksgiving every year, forgetting that they slaughtered the indigenous people shortly afterwards.
America is not even in the teething stage of world "domination" and for a country to be where it is after only 350 years is bloody amazing!
It took us Brits a hell of a lot longer than that!

It's a case of choosing the less evil alternative much of the time. The British did a lot of bad things, but they also left behind a lot of good things.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:12,
archived)

a very brutal and capitalistic culture, and how many other countries and peoples did it try to destroy/take over? I was just making a compairison...
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:04,
archived)

as the historical role of the American Empire seems similar in many ways.
Both were far from perfect, but they brought great improvements in their wake. Like the Aqueduct, and the Interweb.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:06,
archived)
Both were far from perfect, but they brought great improvements in their wake. Like the Aqueduct, and the Interweb.

I should have said the Internet, as opposed to the Web which I think was invented by the English bloke. (or possibly a Swiss one?)
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:09,
archived)

but you don't see that mentioned in the left-leaning media.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:39,
archived)

When do the majority of Amiericans (and I do know that there are some enlightened and sensible ones out there) give a shit about what happens outside the USA?
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:10,
archived)

*goggles at screen*
*jaw goes slack*
*considers buying sandbags and a high-powered rifle*
www.krysstal.com/democracy_whyusa.html
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:24,
archived)
*jaw goes slack*
*considers buying sandbags and a high-powered rifle*
www.krysstal.com/democracy_whyusa.html

economy is dying again, education and environment have been all but forgotten, and what happened to the separation of church and state? I admit the other candidates may not be stellar, but right now I'd love to see anybody but Bush in office.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:25,
archived)

Nope. And at least Arnie's trying.
In this country, Church and State will Never be seperated no matter what, but it's good to see we're trying.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:29,
archived)
In this country, Church and State will Never be seperated no matter what, but it's good to see we're trying.

if the United States wants to introduce a national curriculmn for education - and stick to it - then things may get better, but right now they're bad. Education is not even State governed, it's per district!
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:43,
archived)

Bush is doing something about the greatest threat to the Western world since the Cold War, and the US is no longer completely dominated by the sexism and racism inherent in the politically correct policies of the Clinton years.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:42,
archived)

a woman's right to choose isn't a form of sexism? And on some levels he is promoting religious descrimination.
knew I should have kept my mouth shut and stayed out of this thread...
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:46,
archived)
knew I should have kept my mouth shut and stayed out of this thread...

is stating his case the same way I stated mine.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:47,
archived)

why should I care if a woman does or not? It should be both, or neither.
In any case, the Democrats were and are much more anti-male than the Republicans. Especially in the area of divorce law, child custody and child support.
The Democrats also support affirmative action, which is racist.
So I was happy to see Bush elected, and I hope he gets re-elected.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:53,
archived)
In any case, the Democrats were and are much more anti-male than the Republicans. Especially in the area of divorce law, child custody and child support.
The Democrats also support affirmative action, which is racist.
So I was happy to see Bush elected, and I hope he gets re-elected.

Now I just need to photoshop John Kerry as a carrot, or a horse, or something, and I'll be happy. :)

@ morpheus: and i started this thread... i apologize. blame me. and i am more scared than ever now of whats gonna happen with the US behaving like an empire ... and even able to convince the people who live there that its right.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:56,
archived)

I'm an Australian. And I can assure you that a US empire is preferable to an Islamic or Communist one.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 8:58,
archived)

and we will never be allowed to find out, and how could we? coz its the tendency of empires to impose themselves.
actually, what a great idea: how about we try these three options out for awhile: 10 years US/capitalist then 10 years communist then 10 years islamist. and after that the people decide which one works best. well actually, we prolly wont last that long if the capitalists get to start...
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:02,
archived)
actually, what a great idea: how about we try these three options out for awhile: 10 years US/capitalist then 10 years communist then 10 years islamist. and after that the people decide which one works best. well actually, we prolly wont last that long if the capitalists get to start...

We have historical examples of Communism and contemporary examples of Islamism to look at.
Would you prefer to live in the Soviet Union, Iran, or the US? I know which one I'd prefer.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:04,
archived)
Would you prefer to live in the Soviet Union, Iran, or the US? I know which one I'd prefer.

I didn't have to step into this thread, and probably shouldn't have. I wasn't looking for a debate, only to offer a view that differed from others. Que cera cera. =)
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:07,
archived)

still contributing to this thread. Go ahead and step in and FFS don't apologise for it - doesn't our society (i.e. western culture) pride itself on freedom of speech?
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:10,
archived)

And we'll invade anyone who disagrees. So long as they're sitting on some nice big oil wells.
</troll>
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:14,
archived)
</troll>

I'd invade the country with the most kittens.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:18,
archived)

colonised us culturally, financially and politically. There's no need.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:21,
archived)

freedom of speech is sketchy too... look at what happened to Howard Stern.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:14,
archived)

as you don't have a "right" to broadcast a show on a national network.
Though I don't agree with his sacking, it has nothing to do with the government.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:17,
archived)
Though I don't agree with his sacking, it has nothing to do with the government.

just an example... a broad example, but an example nonetheless. =)
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:19,
archived)