
it does not have a plural form and thefore
should be refered to as lego, no matter the quantity

...is it not plural, i have two lego ppl and a lego board and a lego wall, each lego is a different direct object, therfore, legos
( ,
Wed 10 Mar 2004, 12:11,
archived)

i have 5 sheep.
shedloads of sheep.
this is a piece of lego.
that is lego
those are lego
them am pwitty.
( ,
Wed 10 Mar 2004, 12:13,
archived)
shedloads of sheep.
this is a piece of lego.
that is lego
those are lego
them am pwitty.

I gotta go to school now and i'll check with my english teach if it makes you happy
( ,
Wed 10 Mar 2004, 12:17,
archived)

not even an english word, so checking with and english teacher won't help. its danish, so check with your local danish teacher if you really thing it should be pluralised.
Not to mention its a brand name.
( ,
Wed 10 Mar 2004, 12:21,
archived)
Not to mention its a brand name.

i've not seen any danish teachers around for a while though.
i think they were all killed in the great LEGO wars OF '86.
( ,
Wed 10 Mar 2004, 12:24,
archived)
i think they were all killed in the great LEGO wars OF '86.

lego is like sheep, there is not a plural version of it.
i.e. i have made a wall of lego
not
i have made a wall of legos
( ,
Wed 10 Mar 2004, 12:14,
archived)
i.e. i have made a wall of lego
not
i have made a wall of legos

someone just woo me please, or gimme a little, non-gramatical, constructive critisism?!?
( ,
Wed 10 Mar 2004, 12:12,
archived)

try cutting some frames out, reducing gif colours, increase the file loss a bit.
( ,
Wed 10 Mar 2004, 12:14,
archived)

gramatically i will be anal though and not woo it
sorry