
so that was a tad harsh on the tescos own-brand mild paprikas
but the pixies were/are undeniably a much more influential band
( ,
Tue 30 Mar 2004, 21:22,
archived)
but the pixies were/are undeniably a much more influential band

but as a band, the Chilis piss all over them
literally, you should see the mess backstage
( ,
Tue 30 Mar 2004, 21:23,
archived)
literally, you should see the mess backstage

history has already spoken
no pixies = no nirvana (and = no chillis)
you'll be arguing cliff over elvis next
( ,
Tue 30 Mar 2004, 21:33,
archived)
no pixies = no nirvana (and = no chillis)
you'll be arguing cliff over elvis next

when did the chilis release their first album????
*for the record i do own all the pixies albums and like them a lot*
( ,
Tue 30 Mar 2004, 21:34,
archived)
*for the record i do own all the pixies albums and like them a lot*

1987, and 1991? (pixies and nirvanas debut alubms?)
( ,
Tue 30 Mar 2004, 21:37,
archived)

the pixies have been more influential in general on music
but the chilis made better music (in my opinion of course)
( ,
Tue 30 Mar 2004, 21:40,
archived)
but the chilis made better music (in my opinion of course)

"bah" to first bit
"wow, it's like, we have the same brain" to the second
( ,
Tue 30 Mar 2004, 21:43,
archived)
"wow, it's like, we have the same brain" to the second

i had my brain on time-share
tho that does explain a lot
( ,
Tue 30 Mar 2004, 21:44,
archived)
tho that does explain a lot