b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » When the laws of physics pack up » Message 3349868

[challenge entry]

From the When the laws of physics pack up challenge. See all 348 entries (closed)

(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:18, archived)
# I never met Dolly
lots of my mates did
*sulks*
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:25, archived)
# you should clone her
and meet the clone as often as you like :)
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:29, archived)
# she is stuffed
in a museum in edinburgh. I saw.
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 5:03, archived)
# OK, hold on
is that a chemistry piccie? 'Cos that's my problem with the challenge. I've got about five really great chemistry gags I could do..... but that is not physics, of course.

And, sadly, my physics gags are mostly crap. Plus, drawing molecules is a pain in my pale arse.
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:29, archived)
# i'm drunk
if that's a valid excuse
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:30, archived)
# that
is ALWAYS a valid excuse.

here's your pass

*pours another round*
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:47, archived)
# That's the same excuse
I used at school.
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:47, archived)
# great chemistry gags eh?
A pint of adenosine triphosphate please!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:35, archived)
# That'll be
80p.
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:55, archived)
# Actually,
wouldn't it be ATP ?
;)
edit: Oh, wow was I slow to get that. You knew it all along you clever persons!
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:57, archived)
# If its dolly the sheep
thats more biology, than chemistry or physics
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:35, archived)
# without
physics, there would be no chemistry or biology. So, I would argue that chemistry jokes fall under the physics category.

But, then again, I'm just argumentative.
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:36, archived)
# no youre not.
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:37, archived)
# Yes I am.
Is that the answer you wanted?

;-)
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:40, archived)
# yes :-D
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:41, archived)
# and without biology there would be no ducks
or hats
so ducks with hats on also fall under the physics category
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:39, archived)
# yep.
in a molecular way. Although voles do NOT fall under the physics banner. Nor do clowns and water features.
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:40, archived)
# What about
Mimes?
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:41, archived)
# the less said about mimes the better.
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:43, archived)
# *groan*
or was that not meant as a joke on the lack of talking by MIMES
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:44, archived)
# no, it was.
but it was crap, admittedly...
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:45, archived)
# oh sorry
bit tired/slow/drunk quite good in retrospect
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:51, archived)
# and without ducks with hats there would be more fish
so an abscence of fish could also be due to physics...
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:41, archived)
# see
that's what I think, too.

(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:49, archived)
# The point of the challenge
has always been more to inspire ideas, rather than have things following a strict set of rules.
If you've got ideas, do them, simple as.
(, Sat 19 Jun 2004, 4:54, archived)