
large breasts look horrible when a woman reaches her late thirties to mid-forties onwards. Smaller in size and firm from the start (like the example above) make for a much better looking woman later in life.

but Anna's are tiny, which isn't great either. I just think she's overrated.
( ,
Fri 21 Jan 2005, 19:15,
archived)

I think your research is flawed.

anyone can see that.
edit: and you can't argue with me there. I know bra sizes better than you do I'm sure.
( ,
Fri 21 Jan 2005, 19:17,
archived)
edit: and you can't argue with me there. I know bra sizes better than you do I'm sure.

either way, they'll look good for a long time to come

the number is how large your actual chest is, the bit under the boobs, the letter is the cup size. The number doesn't actually have to do with how big your boobs are. She's not a C, and if she is she's wearing very very abnormal bras.
edit: and why are you so defensive about this? It's not like she is or ever will be anyone you know or care about.
( ,
Fri 21 Jan 2005, 19:23,
archived)
edit: and why are you so defensive about this? It's not like she is or ever will be anyone you know or care about.

don't get into an argument about boobs with a girl. I *have* them, I know a lot more about them and bras than you do.
( ,
Fri 21 Jan 2005, 19:30,
archived)

and perpetuate the myth that bigger is better.
( ,
Fri 21 Jan 2005, 19:32,
archived)

people make blanket statements all the time on here but you choose to pick on me.
are you a flat chested girl or something? if so, sorry for offending you, I'm sure you're lovely.
( ,
Fri 21 Jan 2005, 19:34,
archived)
are you a flat chested girl or something? if so, sorry for offending you, I'm sure you're lovely.

www.b3ta.com/board/4181877
They are so not tiny, you're just bashing her because she is popular and rather attractive.
( ,
Fri 21 Jan 2005, 19:30,
archived)
They are so not tiny, you're just bashing her because she is popular and rather attractive.