I can cross my eyes
But if I dont see it like other people dont see it then whats the problem?
EDIT: its a double image for both scenes anyway so where does the sterioscope thing come into it?
*checks name to make sure he is a photographer*
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:55,
archived)
EDIT: its a double image for both scenes anyway so where does the sterioscope thing come into it?
*checks name to make sure he is a photographer*
In photoshop
overlaying one image against the other, one of them has been skewed or rotated...but sadly it still doesn't work for me either... you must have funny eyes dude! =)
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:59,
archived)
They are not identical images.
They are screen shots taken from two different points of view just like your eyes see two different points of view.
The amount you cross your eyes is about the same as looking at something up close. You just need to control how much by lining up the pics to form a 3rd image between the original two. Practice a little and when you get it it will pop out at you.
Not to mention that the resolution gets extremly clear because of the combined images.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:00,
archived)
The amount you cross your eyes is about the same as looking at something up close. You just need to control how much by lining up the pics to form a 3rd image between the original two. Practice a little and when you get it it will pop out at you.
Not to mention that the resolution gets extremly clear because of the combined images.
I wish I could see it
I CAN see those other 3d type 'magic eye' pics, but not this one.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:01,
archived)
Ah right..Sorry guys
I admit I didnt try the photoshop bit. But in eye terms I didnt see the illusion. Sorry. No offense obviously. Just didnt work for me :-S
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:03,
archived)
if you're doing it properly, the image in your head should look something like this:
img.photobucket.com/albums/v122/barnaclese/stereoeyesexample.jpg
but the middle image shouldn't be blurry, as you only look at about 3 degrees at a time, so the image, like in real life, lines up with anything you're focusing on or anything just as far away, but things that are closer or farther away don't line up. your brain rights this and determines how deep objects are relative to what you're looking at.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:05,
archived)
but the middle image shouldn't be blurry, as you only look at about 3 degrees at a time, so the image, like in real life, lines up with anything you're focusing on or anything just as far away, but things that are closer or farther away don't line up. your brain rights this and determines how deep objects are relative to what you're looking at.
But why?
You have 3 images of differing brightness/contrast...and slightly differing angles. Maybe if it was through a stereoscope Id see it but when its onscreen I doubt it. Sorry!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:08,
archived)
I have a 19" monitor..
I get the feeling my eyes arn't big enough for this screen-effect!..lol
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:08,
archived)
i sized it down; this is just an example. it doesn't work on a two-dimensional medium unless there are actually two separate pictures.
what i'm illustrating with this picture i've posted is how much you should cross your eyes.
you should cross your eyes so that the middle image lines up like that.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:10,
archived)
you should cross your eyes so that the middle image lines up like that.