
works, but I is wasted. so that probably don't count for niffink
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:41,
archived)

right on the screen and go cross eyed. It sort of goes 3D
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:44,
archived)

If it was intended for 3D then Id get some glasses for that...not put my face on the screen like a spacker...no offense
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:46,
archived)

cross your eyes so the image lines up
or, custom-make a stereoscope to fit each of the images, and look through that.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:48,
archived)
or, custom-make a stereoscope to fit each of the images, and look through that.

*Looks for the sterioscope I made for occasions where I may need one*
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:50,
archived)

go with the former.
if you don't want to do either, you can't experience the magic of the picture, and you have no grounds for complaint.
EDIT: do you know how to cross your eyes?
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:51,
archived)
if you don't want to do either, you can't experience the magic of the picture, and you have no grounds for complaint.
EDIT: do you know how to cross your eyes?

But if I dont see it like other people dont see it then whats the problem?
EDIT: its a double image for both scenes anyway so where does the sterioscope thing come into it?
*checks name to make sure he is a photographer*
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:55,
archived)
EDIT: its a double image for both scenes anyway so where does the sterioscope thing come into it?
*checks name to make sure he is a photographer*

overlaying one image against the other, one of them has been skewed or rotated...but sadly it still doesn't work for me either... you must have funny eyes dude! =)
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:59,
archived)

They are screen shots taken from two different points of view just like your eyes see two different points of view.
The amount you cross your eyes is about the same as looking at something up close. You just need to control how much by lining up the pics to form a 3rd image between the original two. Practice a little and when you get it it will pop out at you.
Not to mention that the resolution gets extremly clear because of the combined images.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:00,
archived)
The amount you cross your eyes is about the same as looking at something up close. You just need to control how much by lining up the pics to form a 3rd image between the original two. Practice a little and when you get it it will pop out at you.
Not to mention that the resolution gets extremly clear because of the combined images.

I CAN see those other 3d type 'magic eye' pics, but not this one.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:01,
archived)

I admit I didnt try the photoshop bit. But in eye terms I didnt see the illusion. Sorry. No offense obviously. Just didnt work for me :-S
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:03,
archived)

img.photobucket.com/albums/v122/barnaclese/stereoeyesexample.jpg
but the middle image shouldn't be blurry, as you only look at about 3 degrees at a time, so the image, like in real life, lines up with anything you're focusing on or anything just as far away, but things that are closer or farther away don't line up. your brain rights this and determines how deep objects are relative to what you're looking at.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:05,
archived)
but the middle image shouldn't be blurry, as you only look at about 3 degrees at a time, so the image, like in real life, lines up with anything you're focusing on or anything just as far away, but things that are closer or farther away don't line up. your brain rights this and determines how deep objects are relative to what you're looking at.

You have 3 images of differing brightness/contrast...and slightly differing angles. Maybe if it was through a stereoscope Id see it but when its onscreen I doubt it. Sorry!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:08,
archived)

I get the feeling my eyes arn't big enough for this screen-effect!..lol
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:08,
archived)

what i'm illustrating with this picture i've posted is how much you should cross your eyes.
you should cross your eyes so that the middle image lines up like that.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:10,
archived)
you should cross your eyes so that the middle image lines up like that.

Just doesn't work on my screen/eyes.
If it did you could write a book and make more pics and get rich! Woo!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:16,
archived)
If it did you could write a book and make more pics and get rich! Woo!

Just go crosseyed so your lefteye looks at the right image and righteye t'other
then focus on the third image that appears inbetween
it is fuckin' freaky
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:52,
archived)
then focus on the third image that appears inbetween
it is fuckin' freaky

the better it works. About arms length is good.
Be sure there is no glare on your screen from light behind you. Keep your eyes level with the picture and look at it straight on.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:43,
archived)
Be sure there is no glare on your screen from light behind you. Keep your eyes level with the picture and look at it straight on.

trying to find something in that...I just dont see it. Im sorry. Dont hate me for that but I really dont get it :-S
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:49,
archived)

No offense intended but all I see is 2 images for each thing. Glad Im not the only one.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:51,
archived)

x
/edit deleted cos it was doin me ed in.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:16,
archived)
/edit deleted cos it was doin me ed in.