Oooh
Not bad, not bad.
But what would you have done if the area that was watermarked and peeling had been on building, not sky?
( ,
Sat 11 Jun 2005, 13:06,
archived)
But what would you have done if the area that was watermarked and peeling had been on building, not sky?
This one was just a 5 min job. I've done some FAR worse before.
( ,
Sat 11 Jun 2005, 13:08,
archived)
you could do some kind of postal thing where people send the pictures, you can them, do them up, and send them back a CD or a photo print
.. actually! fuck it.. I`m quitting my job and learning how to use photoshop!
( ,
Sat 11 Jun 2005, 13:10,
archived)
.. actually! fuck it.. I`m quitting my job and learning how to use photoshop!
I thought of that. In fact I got pretty close to starting something once, then as per usual I couldnt be arsed to follow it through
( ,
Sat 11 Jun 2005, 13:10,
archived)
I've got my own design business and believe me, the photo restoration business is VERY over saturated*
*sorry for the crap photography type pun there.
/coat
( ,
Sat 11 Jun 2005, 13:20,
archived)
*sorry for the crap photography type pun there.
/coat
nice job!
my hardest case of photo restoration:
Polaroid print of the '70s, kept in a wallet and therefore scratched, dusty etc.
After many tests, the best technique (although a little bit daring) was to drop some water on the scanner and put the photo on it.
A flat weight on the photo squeezed most of the water out, leaving enough to do a thin film betweem the glass and the plastinc film covering the photo.
the wet effect almost completely "removed" all those sratches that were on the photo, with an effect far better that I could ever hope doing with photoshop.
and (to my surprise) the photo was not daamged at all by the process!
( ,
Sat 11 Jun 2005, 14:00,
archived)
Polaroid print of the '70s, kept in a wallet and therefore scratched, dusty etc.
After many tests, the best technique (although a little bit daring) was to drop some water on the scanner and put the photo on it.
A flat weight on the photo squeezed most of the water out, leaving enough to do a thin film betweem the glass and the plastinc film covering the photo.
the wet effect almost completely "removed" all those sratches that were on the photo, with an effect far better that I could ever hope doing with photoshop.
and (to my surprise) the photo was not daamged at all by the process!