Could do. But I rather liked the "to ensure we don't have to" - I thought it was quite clever. It would be, too, if I could make it work properly...
EDIT: Or does it work perfectly adequately already? Am I just being a silly pedantic bastard?
(,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 10:30,
archived)
EDIT: Or does it work perfectly adequately already? Am I just being a silly pedantic bastard?
"Banning is a last resort, and we'd prefer not to do it. Please read our forum rules to ensure we don't have to use that option."
(,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 10:36,
archived)
:)
Suppose it depends whether you're running some kind of mind-blowingly serious messageboard, though - it wouldn't really work on a paedo victims support network or whatever. :/
(,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 10:45,
archived)
Suppose it depends whether you're running some kind of mind-blowingly serious messageboard, though - it wouldn't really work on a paedo victims support network or whatever. :/
/although I like grey kid's too :¬)
(,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 10:39,
archived)
That works too. You may fight Ptolemy for the prize.
/I like grey kid's too, but the rest of the message is quite formal. His would work well on a b3ta-style message, but not this one.
(,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 10:44,
archived)
/I like grey kid's too, but the rest of the message is quite formal. His would work well on a b3ta-style message, but not this one.
*blushes* - to be honest Geoff, writing's the only damn thing I'm any good at; I'm crap at pictures and often think I'm here under false pretences
(,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 10:52,
archived)
as much as talent*
*has none and therefore has yet to post a shopped pic*
(,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 10:58,
archived)
*has none and therefore has yet to post a shopped pic*

