(swazaI'm bad, I'm bad. You know it. I'm bad.,
Tue 22 Aug 2006, 14:45,
archived)
that's what people will tell you
but really it's because of THE GRADIENTS
(Wasp Boxlike a nervous random stranger at a glory hole,
Tue 22 Aug 2006, 14:47,
archived)
but then again,
if I calculate the derivative of the colour index along an arbitrary contour C in the plane of the images, I find significant regions containing non-zero values.
(habermanis singing in the changes,
Tue 22 Aug 2006, 14:48,
archived)
*Frenet Serrets in the face*
(swazaI'm bad, I'm bad. You know it. I'm bad.,
Tue 22 Aug 2006, 14:51,
archived)
wtfyoa?
it is patently because of the gradients
(Derek Montesubthread killer: qu'est-ce que c'est,
Tue 22 Aug 2006, 14:48,
archived)
Share to
Hide / Ignore
Hide
If you want to unhide this post later, click the "update profile" link in the top navigation bar, and scroll down to the bottom.
Ignore
You will be blisfully unaware of this user for just one week