
though technically crap, is in fact notable for being the first sub £100 computer, thus bringing computers to the masses.
(anyone with any sense saved up for a VIC-20 though :)
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:40,
archived)
(anyone with any sense saved up for a VIC-20 though :)

thet the speccy was far superiour to the C64 and was the most popular home computer of that time, so ner!
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:42,
archived)

had both and they both had there strengths and weaknesses.Funny thing is the excuses by the c64 and the speccy were better than each other are exactly the same excuses why the ps2 is better than the xbox....how little things change....
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:44,
archived)

...although it is shaping up to be the Amstrad of the modern day. Bah.
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:46,
archived)

are all too similar to each other, and have loads of the same games. There's not much to make you choose one over the others.
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:52,
archived)

The Guinness Book of Records officially lists the C64 as the biggest selling single model of computer in history, with over 22 million units sold world wide.
Plus it has better graphics and sound. Oh and better games too.
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:45,
archived)
Plus it has better graphics and sound. Oh and better games too.

I had a speccy and it ruled. But I came from a poor family and we could only afford dirt to eat and I had to sell a leg to buy the speccy. There was no way that I could have owned one of your fancy "VIC-20"'s..
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:44,
archived)

was the ZX-81 competitor, C64 was the Spectrum competitor. Get your computer generations right, man!
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:49,
archived)