b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 6328021 (Thread)

# if you we going to drop a cat in acid you want to watch wouldn't you?
i think that's the flaw in his theory.

/huntingdon life sciences blog
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:14, archived)
# you do like trying to rub me up the wrong way don't you ;)
Just use that big barbed dildo like I told you.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:16, archived)
# hehehe
sorry, it's not aimed directly at you.

and i couldn't hurt animals in a cruel way, killing for food, like bunnys, pheasents, etc...

that's fine by me, culling grey squiggles, not a problem, tis fine by me.

not a big fan of animal testing, even less vivisection.

all aprt from teh persian cat that comes into my garden and shits everywhere, he shall be getting a big blast with the super soaker next time i see him.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:31, archived)
# Huntingdon Life Sciences is actually a really clean place
except for the people outside.

In all seriousness though, while I agree testing cosmetics and things on rabbits is a waste of good mascara, the place does actually kill the wee beasties ina relatively humane way...before cutting their heads off with a big pair of teachers scissors.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:20, archived)
# I would have no problems with testing of drugs and cosmetics
if it was done on humans and babies.

I fail to see how mankind has managed to decide we have a greater right to live than any other species on the planet.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:22, archived)
# It's all about money
and while the corporations (who act all corporationey) have it, animals do not. Governments will grant licenses to companies to do that sort of thing in exchange for some healthy donations.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:27, archived)
# Tell it to the stingrays
:P
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:27, archived)