I'm gonna have to stand up for Scope15 hereThere are some images that can't be reduced that much that can't really be given a link/thumbnail that works. I've frequently posted 90kish images with the Daily Opiate and nobody complained. Sure, the opiate is more text heavy but you could argue it applies in this case. That said he may just not have made much effort with the compression slider.
(,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:41,
archived)
jesus would go around optimising other peoples images, cos they are too lasy to try.........
Just Flange,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:43,
archived)
it was ruder than thatit was autoedited
was along the lines of
"In your plucking mace 90k"
(was along the lines of
"In your plucking mace 90k"
SiX and his hat,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:47,
archived)
oh i see!thought you were saying mine was still 90K
( Just Flange,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:51,
archived)
right on!as in 99.9% of other cases.
Not optimizing images is just disrespect towards people who are on slow/capped connections.
So next time don't be surprized if the board "nazi" get at you essentially for being lazy.
(Not optimizing images is just disrespect towards people who are on slow/capped connections.
So next time don't be surprized if the board "nazi" get at you essentially for being lazy.
Your watch is BACK,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:52,
archived)