I'm gonna have to stand up for Scope15 here
There are some images that can't be reduced that much that can't really be given a link/thumbnail that works. I've frequently posted 90kish images with the Daily Opiate and nobody complained. Sure, the opiate is more text heavy but you could argue it applies in this case. That said he may just not have made much effort with the compression slider.
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:41,
archived)
jesus would go around optimising other peoples images, cos they are too lasy to try.........
( , Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:43, archived)
( , Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:43, archived)
it was ruder than that
it was autoedited
was along the lines of
"In your plucking mace 90k"
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:47,
archived)
was along the lines of
"In your plucking mace 90k"
right on!
as in 99.9% of other cases.
Not optimizing images is just disrespect towards people who are on slow/capped connections.
So next time don't be surprized if the board "nazi" get at you essentially for being lazy.
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:52,
archived)
Not optimizing images is just disrespect towards people who are on slow/capped connections.
So next time don't be surprized if the board "nazi" get at you essentially for being lazy.
took out the
"and try and second guess his actions." because most pictures on here have left that part out too
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:40,
archived)
Look at your grammar
Please :-)
edit: in another message you used "too" to mean "to" and there you used "to" to mean "too".
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:45,
archived)
edit: in another message you used "too" to mean "to" and there you used "to" to mean "too".
OH MY GOD!
Somone on the internet that corrects grammer!
I don't care! Its b3ta and not an english exam.
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:49,
archived)
I don't care! Its b3ta and not an english exam.
*it's
/runs
edit: *grammar... but you i'll let that slide as being on purpose to prove a point?
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:52,
archived)
edit: *grammar... but you i'll let that slide as being on purpose to prove a point?
RIS? THREAD JACK!!!!!! I've been asked a stupid question: Please help
"If you the image resolution for internet purposes, then lost the orgional image is there a way to restore the resolution or at least re sharpen the image as much as possible. Is there any software or trick ontatty shop?"
I am fucking clueless on Tattyshop so any (Good) advice is welcome.
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:41,
archived)
I am fucking clueless on Tattyshop so any (Good) advice is welcome.
first of all - what??? makes no sense
second of all - no - no theres not
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:43,
archived)
You need a holywood super-image-enhancement doohicky. The kind that can turn Dungeon Hack in to Oblivion!
You could probably make a cheap, scrawled attempt at restoring some sharpness if it's not too much of a resize but there's no way to restore an image that's been shrunk unless it's still in the 'undo' cache.
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:45,
archived)
Err...
Nope. Once you've downsampled an image to 72ppi that's it - you've lost the original detail. You can re-sample at 300ppi or whatever you want, but it'll look identical. Sharpening'll just create unpleasant artifacts.
Best advice - back up the master images. Sorry not to be more help.
( ,
Thu 9 Nov 2006, 17:48,
archived)
Best advice - back up the master images. Sorry not to be more help.