How was anyone supposed to know it was in jest, if you gave no indication of such?It just looked like a very petty and unrequired dig.
(
mugatu,
Sat 18 Nov 2006, 20:40,
archived)
See the above.I honestly didn't think it would be necessary. I now stand, or sit, corrected and will be sure to add a stupid emoticon to indicate my mood at time of writing to all my future posts.*
:-|
* emoticons may not always be included in future posts
(:-|
* emoticons may not always be included in future posts
S tr app y,
Sat 18 Nov 2006, 20:43,
archived)
sorry for jumping on you a bitIt's just that b3ta has been flooded with really petty 'Read the FAQ' posts recently, and it was impossible to tell your response apart from one of those.
( mugatu,
Sat 18 Nov 2006, 20:47,
archived)
Ah, I wasn't aware of that.I apologise for provoking the misinterpretation of my intentions; I've not really bothered to read too many of the replies recently.
p.s. I still think it's a very good post, BTW.
(p.s. I still think it's a very good post, BTW.
S tr app y,
Sat 18 Nov 2006, 20:59,
archived)
WHAT!?!?!You didn't read replies?
READ THE F*^KING BOARD NOOB!
;-)
(READ THE F*^KING BOARD NOOB!
;-)
betpet is the fun in dysfunctional,
Sat 18 Nov 2006, 21:06,
archived)
for what it's worth at this point......i got the joke.
then again, i have cable so these size issues never affect me. everyone have a nice cup of hemlock and simmer down.
(then again, i have cable so these size issues never affect me. everyone have a nice cup of hemlock and simmer down.
postbear has metal knees,
Sat 18 Nov 2006, 20:48,
archived)