
and as their company is picking up the tab, it doesn't matter to them whether the flight is £60 or £600.
There should be a carbon allowance, per head, for large companies, and if they exceed it, they should befined cunted in the fuck.
( ,
Mon 11 Dec 2006, 15:00,
archived)
There should be a carbon allowance, per head, for large companies, and if they exceed it, they should be

as companies budget for the fines, as they are outweighed by the profit
( ,
Mon 11 Dec 2006, 15:02,
archived)


if and when we actually got too hot.
Something technological, rather than pissy, ineffectual and restrictive.
( ,
Mon 11 Dec 2006, 15:14,
archived)
Something technological, rather than pissy, ineffectual and restrictive.

a load of bollocks anyway.
You fly somewhere, pay for a tree to be planted, but it takes the tree 20 years to absorb the carbon from that 1 journey.
You fly a month later.. another tree... combined timescale 40yrs...
.........and so it goes on.......
( ,
Mon 11 Dec 2006, 15:03,
archived)
You fly somewhere, pay for a tree to be planted, but it takes the tree 20 years to absorb the carbon from that 1 journey.
You fly a month later.. another tree... combined timescale 40yrs...
.........and so it goes on.......