
I just don't give a shit. Really. 'Twice as big as it needs to be' doesn't make me suddenly step back and give a shit, either.
The 'reminder' posts, friendly as they may be, are easily as annoying as an image that could be a little smaller. IT DOESN'T BLOODY MATTER. If it's 500k or something, then let's talk about it.
( ,
Mon 18 Dec 2006, 19:13,
archived)
The 'reminder' posts, friendly as they may be, are easily as annoying as an image that could be a little smaller. IT DOESN'T BLOODY MATTER. If it's 500k or something, then let's talk about it.

You're making a mountain out of a fucking molehill, and completely ignoring non broadband users. A page of 25 50k posts is about 1 meg. A page of 25 100kb posts is about 2 meg. That's not an insignificant difference. If Rob or whoever deems that now is the time to move on as more people have broadband then that's fine, and the FAQ can be updated (that's not exactly difficult). Until such a time it's only fair to try to keep people within the guidelines.
( ,
Mon 18 Dec 2006, 19:24,
archived)

besides which, if you're going to come to B3ta you should expect long loads exactly the same way you'd expect them with flash cartoon sites.
( ,
Mon 18 Dec 2006, 19:30,
archived)

is that they've not updated the FAQ, not that people are trying to abide by it and encourage abiding by it.
( ,
Mon 18 Dec 2006, 19:31,
archived)

50k isn't a bad guidline. Hell, we've covered why.
( ,
Mon 18 Dec 2006, 19:33,
archived)

There's no reason whatsoever for there actually to be a specific code for general users to trigger
when they feel a user ought be reminded of the guidance of the FAQ....
( ,
Mon 18 Dec 2006, 19:38,
archived)
when they feel a user ought be reminded of the guidance of the FAQ....

You're pulling my string!
That gets a woo even if it could be considered frightful commie propaganda against the Fuhrer :o)
( ,
Mon 18 Dec 2006, 20:01,
archived)
That gets a woo even if it could be considered frightful commie propaganda against the Fuhrer :o)

b3ta is already painfully slow at some times
and what's so bad about trying to optimize? it's normally about two clicks in ps and a minute on the clock with most pictures.
if the picture is not that easily compressable or if it would suffer from severe quality loss due to compression, that's another matter
( ,
Mon 18 Dec 2006, 19:39,
archived)
and what's so bad about trying to optimize? it's normally about two clicks in ps and a minute on the clock with most pictures.
if the picture is not that easily compressable or if it would suffer from severe quality loss due to compression, that's another matter