b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 666916 (Thread)

# But if the original experiment was fixed
then how does that help exactly?
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 12:54, archived)
# hmm
not sure which 'original experiment' you are thinking of, though intelligence testing has an entirely dodgy history.

Read 'The Mismeasure of Man' by SJ Gould for the story, it's a great book
book here
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 12:58, archived)
# yes will do
SJ Gould was an excellent bloke in my opinion. As for the "original experiment" thing well i don't know, it was something that was told to me a long time ago and has stuck in my head. I s'pose it could have been the deciding what is average part of the thing.

Edit: I was just badly trying to say I guess, that if the concept is flawed due to bad practice fromthe start then how can that help? I think I need a new vocabulary
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 13:13, archived)
# IQ is relative,
to a supposed average which they get from a large sample of the relevant population, I believe. So it doesn't matter that the first test was flawed.
Whether it tests for anything other then the ability to do IQ tests is up for debate, however.
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 13:01, archived)
# or
whether there is even 'a thing' to measure
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 13:06, archived)