I think 'Fair Usage'And the fact that something new and unique has been made out of images posted here mitigates the fact they're 'nicked' images.
The fact that Zoo/Nuts just crop the images to avoid crediting whoever made them makes what they do, I believe, technically intellectual property theft.
If I found any of my work in their crappy mag I'd take them to the fucking cleaners. But as I'm not good enough, I doubt that's a situation I'll ever find myself in.
(,
Tue 8 May 2007, 11:01,
archived)
The fact that Zoo/Nuts just crop the images to avoid crediting whoever made them makes what they do, I believe, technically intellectual property theft.
If I found any of my work in their crappy mag I'd take them to the fucking cleaners. But as I'm not good enough, I doubt that's a situation I'll ever find myself in.
uk law doesn't have 'fair usage'so that argument doesn't hold up
(
mictoboy shitting in your cunt since,
Tue 8 May 2007, 11:02,
archived)
you could argue it's satirebut I bet it would be wobbly in court :D
(
discomeats This canoe,
Tue 8 May 2007, 11:23,
archived)