He does have some good points in his arguments(assumes that you're an atheist)
(,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:31,
archived)
*is not an atheist*That said, I can reason and the man is a fucking religious nutcase.
Proper fundy.
(Proper fundy.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:33,
archived)
As I see ityou can't really "prove" the existence of god, so in a way, there's no need for all these arguments, as long as people aren't being killed for their beliefs.. oh, wait..
(,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:34,
archived)
My personal stance is that it surpasses man's understanding.I am happy with that. I have my own beliefs, but they are exactly that - the secret of life is a guessing game and people who guess differently to me are not wrong, they just have a different idea.
Saying other people's opinions on something which is beyond proof are wrong is wrong.
Intolerance is about the only thing I cannot tolerate - I believe in deregulation and that, so long as it doesn't effect other people, folk should do as they wish.
(Saying other people's opinions on something which is beyond proof are wrong is wrong.
Intolerance is about the only thing I cannot tolerate - I believe in deregulation and that, so long as it doesn't effect other people, folk should do as they wish.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:38,
archived)
and shoot the catholicsof course?
( Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:47,
archived)
What?Dawkings is obviously right, and anyone who disagrees with him is a porridge-for-brains fuckhead.
( Watney Heckbulb uhnnnnnnnn has a new blog: www.skepticcanary.com,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:36,
archived)
That seems to be his stance,yes.
( LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:41,
archived)
Here here . . even if climbing mount improbable is the most boring thing i've ever read.
(,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 21:42,
archived)
TALK BOARD.God damned debaters
(
evilamnesiac says fuck you Prince,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:37,
archived)