Yeah right.Whatever.
I mean proper lesbians - like the ones in the magazines and documentaries. Not the ugly pretenders.
(I mean proper lesbians - like the ones in the magazines and documentaries. Not the ugly pretenders.
Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Fri 17 Aug 2007, 15:19,
archived)
Damn right.I agree with that so much I was forced to do it in an American style. :/
wheelybird mreee!,
Fri 17 Aug 2007, 15:20,
archived)
ah yes, i see what you're getting at :Dhowever, i still think that an all-male bumming jamboree would not need them, per se
(
mutster101 fell over,
Fri 17 Aug 2007, 15:23,
archived)
Of course it would.If it included said lezzers, you'd be able to also sell it to straight men and bi-curious and gay women. Think of the profit!
( wheelybird mreee!,
Fri 17 Aug 2007, 15:28,
archived)
yes yes, it would be enhanced by them, but it doesn't actually _need_ themit would still be an all male bumming jamboree without them.
( mutster101 fell over,
Fri 17 Aug 2007, 15:32,
archived)
You are wrong.Scientific fact.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Fri 17 Aug 2007, 15:43,
archived)
It would bean "all male bumming jamboree lacking lesbians". These's no way round that.
( Three Dog Man,
Fri 17 Aug 2007, 15:57,
archived)