b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 7582232 (Thread)

# That's fair. I did start with a reasonable post, but got sucked in.
I just think that a desire to look at animals sexually and, in particular, producing images portraying it, is likely to lead to animals being abused to produce more obscene images.

Much as cartoons of child abuse would upset me because they will likely bring people in to the idea of child porn and result in a child getting hurt to make that porn.

I think that blatently promoting sexual thoughts towards animals is tantamount to inciting animal cruelty.

My words were likely to have been 'as long as they don't interfere with anyone else' - the law is unlikely to come into it. I think that animals being interfered with is a reason not to do it.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:29, archived)
# fair enough
you should blame Disney, Warner and others too then, they introduced anthropomorphic animals (with partly very clear female proportions) to millions of kids ;)
(I helped save b3ta! pzyko Query failed., Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:37, archived)
# I don;t think Disney and co are to blame
anthropomorphasising (sp?!) goes back at the very least to Egyptian Gods, but most ancient folk tales have manly beasts and feminine serpents and such
(I helped save b3ta! HappyToast Groat froth, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 22:48, archived)
# Manley beasts?
Zeus used to be into bestiality in a big way.

I often ask myself 'what would Zeus do?'

It's almost always 'turn into a swan and rape a teenager'.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 5 Sep 2007, 23:00, archived)
# or even into a shower of gold O_o

(I helped save b3ta! pzyko Query failed., Wed 5 Sep 2007, 23:09, archived)
# yes
but the "Disney is evil" theory is far more exciting

and it's "anthropomorphising" I think :)
(I helped save b3ta! pzyko Query failed., Wed 5 Sep 2007, 23:08, archived)