
the timings on this .gif are all to cock

...it runs as quickly as it's intended to run on my machine yet it's piss-poor slow when it's exported.
I use 'Fireworks' - anyone else ever had similar problems?
Ta
( ,
Tue 9 Oct 2007, 20:41,
archived)

...it runs as quickly as it's intended to run on my machine yet it's piss-poor slow when it's exported.
I use 'Fireworks' - anyone else ever had similar problems?
Ta

I do like your image however.
Imageready is really rather good though (as is flash, if (unlike My Lordship) it doesn't always go to cock when you use it).
( ,
Tue 9 Oct 2007, 20:43,
archived)
Imageready is really rather good though (as is flash, if (unlike My Lordship) it doesn't always go to cock when you use it).

which for reasons i've no hope of understanding always seems to make things go quicker than ie.
i like to think it's just because it has fire in it's name and is therefore hotter.
( ,
Tue 9 Oct 2007, 20:45,
archived)
i like to think it's just because it has fire in it's name and is therefore hotter.

I'm going with god save the queens thoughts. Firefox IS fieryer.
( ,
Tue 9 Oct 2007, 20:52,
archived)

I first noticed it earlier today, with this next .gif

on my machine the 'moving message' is in sych with the post box - however once the file is exported the whole thing goes to rat shit.
Any ideas?
( ,
Tue 9 Oct 2007, 21:01,
archived)

on my machine the 'moving message' is in sych with the post box - however once the file is exported the whole thing goes to rat shit.
Any ideas?