I don't think transparent scanlines work as optimisation
(
The Coast Of Yemen,
Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:25,
archived)
infact, they scientifically do the opposite!
(
discomeats This canoe,
Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:27,
archived)
SCIENCE!
(
THIRTY-TWO - Sputnik -,
Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:28,
archived)
OMG SCIENCE!!!ONE!!(one)3!!!
(
discomeats This canoe,
Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:30,
archived)
a) It worked fine
b) I didn't do it for the optimisation - it looks crap without them.
(
ClanSoul,
Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:29,
archived)
Heh, fair enough
but that tutorial you did was more for making things look cool than making them small.
(
The Coast Of Yemen,
Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:31,
archived)
Which is exactly what I was after.
+ this one is about 600kb less than the other one!
(
ClanSoul,
Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:37,
archived)
I just looked
I didn't realise the link I posted said to use opacity or overlay blend. If you really want to cut the file size, just fill a layer with the scanlines and don't change the opacity
: D
(
McBadger COW,
Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:40,
archived)