b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7775523 (Thread)

# Just because I really wanted to.
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:18, archived)
# T'is very awesome!
Woo!
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:21, archived)
# Nicely!
Good striking action there
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:22, archived)
# Thanks,
but to be honest, I think it looks a bit rubbish-y :P
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:23, archived)
# What is its name?
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:23, archived)
#
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:23, archived)
# I don't think transparent scanlines work as optimisation
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:25, archived)
# infact, they scientifically do the opposite!
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:27, archived)
# SCIENCE!
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:28, archived)
# OMG SCIENCE!!!ONE!!(one)3!!!
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:30, archived)
# a) It worked fine
b) I didn't do it for the optimisation - it looks crap without them.
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:29, archived)
# Heh, fair enough
but that tutorial you did was more for making things look cool than making them small.
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:31, archived)
# Which is exactly what I was after.
+ this one is about 600kb less than the other one!
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:37, archived)
# I just looked
I didn't realise the link I posted said to use opacity or overlay blend. If you really want to cut the file size, just fill a layer with the scanlines and don't change the opacity
: D
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:40, archived)
# hey thats nice..

mine on the other is quite large and quite rubbish..it does move in the end
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:26, archived)
# Ha yes!
(, Sun 11 Nov 2007, 17:28, archived)