0.9999999etc is almost one...
0.99999 recurring IS one.
The human mind can't deal with infinity. ;P
(
Hamster Trippin' aka Mr. Titts,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:12,
archived)
but by definition it is not one, it is less than by an infinitely small amount?
(
HappyToast Groat froth,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:15,
archived)
;)
(
Hamster Trippin' aka Mr. Titts,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:21,
archived)
Yes but 9.999999 is not 1
it's far closer to 10
;)
(
spartacus_mills and Rex Hamilton as Abraham Lincoln!,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:25,
archived)
Do keep up dear!
:)
(
Hamster Trippin' aka Mr. Titts,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:30,
archived)
Dear lord. You really are stupid.
www.b3ta.com/board/7794453
You put a 9, not a 0 in your original post.
Wahey , ninja edit. Well done ;)
(
spartacus_mills and Rex Hamilton as Abraham Lincoln!,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:35,
archived)
Oh well done you pedantic twat
:P
(
Hamster Trippin' aka Mr. Titts,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:42,
archived)
Well, if you will insist on makjing yourself look an absolute twunt
cos after all, when it comes to maths who needs to put the correct numbers in anyway
;)
I expect you'll take it with the same good grace as the whole Primus/See you next Tuesday thing though :P
(
spartacus_mills and Rex Hamilton as Abraham Lincoln!,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:44,
archived)
You seem to be developing a bit of a complex about me...
*fears*
Why the name change? Made too many enemies?
(
Hamster Trippin' aka Mr. Titts,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:47,
archived)
I'm changing it to a symbol next week. Don't think about ever using it though. My lawyers see everything ;)
(
spartacus_mills and Rex Hamilton as Abraham Lincoln!,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:55,
archived)
"infinitely small amount"
doesn't mean anything, really. What you do is say that it's 1-e where e is really small and then let e tend to zero, say by dividing it by 2 repeatedly. Which in the limiting case of infinite divisions gives you 1.
(
boris the spider,
Fri 16 Nov 2007, 15:24,
archived)