b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7925757 (Thread)

# Which is better?


or



See also 'Better but 485k
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:15, archived)
# You saved them wrong - the first one only breaks out of the frame once.
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:17, archived)
# Yep, and the big one is the same.
And I have closed imageready now, so I'm screwed.

Oh well, I'll have to go for the frame then.
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:18, archived)
# The 3rd
But I suggest you to stop also the trails on the disk...

(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:17, archived)
# ^
Moving grooves = huh?
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:18, archived)
# I was too idle to cut out the stylus arm.
It's sad, but true.

What I was after opinions on was whether to cut it out of the frame or leave it enclosed, but I have saved it badly and not kept the source pdf, so . . .
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:19, archived)
# I like that.
Alot.
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:19, archived)
# Bugger.
I'll have to finish it properly now ;¬(
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:20, archived)
# Cool.
Does anyone here still favour vinyl?

I dooh.
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:19, archived)
# By far !
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:21, archived)
# yes
and cassette tapes, and reels
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 8:02, archived)
# The one going at 33 1/3 sounds better . . .
the other one is also pretty nice though !
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:21, archived)
# Ohhhh, that's smart as they're 12"'s.
Have a point of awesomeness:

AWXOME x 1.
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:22, archived)
# L P's
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:24, archived)
# That's what i thought,
It being impossible to tell if they are LPs or 12" singles, who could say?

It is, in fact, a 78, so it'll be fun and pitched up whichever speed you play it.
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:25, archived)
# Well to be fair, it must be a LP, as the grooves kinda suggest more than 1 or 2 tracks.
I loves me records, I doos.
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:26, archived)
# Indeed, it does look that way.
However I own 12" singles with multiple tracks on them.
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:35, archived)
# You are right:
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:36, archived)
# I don't understand what you are saying here.
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:24, archived)
# Never the less . . .
your concept is uncanningly uncanny . . .
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:31, archived)
# ^ Troof.
Unc'unny.
(, Mon 7 Jan 2008, 2:35, archived)