nude != pornnor does it mean NSFW.
Michaelangelo's David? Nude
Some of Titian's work? Nude
Are they porn? Only if you're a blinkered US Attourney General
NSFW? Hardly.
It's about context, which is what the above colleagues of ours have been saying. Resorting to name calling means you just lost the argument anyway.
Have a biscuit.
(Michaelangelo's David? Nude
Some of Titian's work? Nude
Are they porn? Only if you're a blinkered US Attourney General
NSFW? Hardly.
It's about context, which is what the above colleagues of ours have been saying. Resorting to name calling means you just lost the argument anyway.
Have a biscuit.
gfreeman is only here for the beer,
Fri 18 Jan 2008, 18:18,
archived)
i dont think "the only images that are NSFW are 'porny'or that our bosses derive their moral stance from an online FAQ...'
You're reading into my comment things that I didn't say.
My point is that just because there's an image containing nudity does not mean its NSFW.
(You're reading into my comment things that I didn't say.
My point is that just because there's an image containing nudity does not mean its NSFW.
gfreeman is only here for the beer,
Fri 18 Jan 2008, 18:29,
archived)