But if I download something I really like, I save up for a while and buy the album, cos I love having the case, the cd, and all the album art. ^.^
(,
Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:01,
archived)
but downloading something when you have no intention of buying it is something else.
(,
Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:03,
archived)
So half the stuff I downloaded? Ah well. I buy enough merch and concert tickets. It's not like the musicians are at all starving.
(,
Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:04,
archived)
Cos what if you like alright, but you just don't want to spend money on it? FUCK YOU I'M RIGHT! NANERNANERNANER
(,
Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:08,
archived)
you can't own it. That's how it is for just about every consumer product, why should music be any different?
(,
Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:09,
archived)
and you borrow it and put it on your mp3 player?
Is that stealing? That and the cds my parents have is where almost all of my music is from.
(,
Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:13,
archived)
Is that stealing? That and the cds my parents have is where almost all of my music is from.
But it's safe to say that sharing a CD in a household is a completely different thing to downloading an album from the internet.
And yes, I'd say your example is technically stealing.
(,
Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:16,
archived)
And yes, I'd say your example is technically stealing.
basically
but who cares.
artists get sod all from their music these days even when it is bought, hence why the decline of the superstar.
(,
Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:18,
archived)
but who cares.
artists get sod all from their music these days even when it is bought, hence why the decline of the superstar.
most of my music is my parents' anyway.
(,
Mon 25 Feb 2008, 22:04,
archived)