Advertising revenue.
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:40,
archived)
Yes, but it's free to look at,where as the magazines are directly charging people to look at [your/someone's] work.
I'd say that was the major difference, which is what the question was.
I'm not saying neither of them are arses.
(I'd say that was the major difference, which is what the question was.
I'm not saying neither of them are arses.
Kamikaze Stoat £4.09,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:44,
archived)
They'll still be earning money thanks to other peoples images.I don't know how much money, and this issue doesn't really affect me as I'm too shit to have my work stolen.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Tue 26 Feb 2008, 17:46,
archived)